Corporate Governance

Governance Structure

The foundation of sustainable enterprise management lies in a robust governance system— one that is deeply rooted in the ASUS DNA: humility, integrity, diligence, agility, and courage. ASUS integrates corporate governance into its operational systems, fulfills its corporate social responsibility, and safeguard the rights and interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, the environment, and society.

To further strengthen corporate governance, ASUS has established its own "Best Practice Principles of Corporate Governance", in alignment with the "Corporate Governance Best Practice Principles for TWSE/GTSM Listed Companies" and the OECD corporate governance principles. In addition to outlining governance structures and regulations, these principles encompass the protection of shareholder rights, the enhancement of board functions, the execution of supervisory responsibilities, and the respect for stakeholder interests.

Board of Directors

The Board of Directors of ASUS takes high efficiency, transparency, diversity, and professionalism as key measures for strengthening corporate governance. Our Board of Directors consider professional skills such as business judgments, accounting and financial analysis, operation and management, crisis response, knowledge of the industry, international market perspectives, leadership, and decision-making, avoid blind spots in decision making. All members of the Company's Board of Directors are elected based on a candidate nomination system.

In accordance with the “Rules for Election of Directors” , the 13th Board of Directors was elected at the May 2025 shareholders’ meeting. The Board2 is composed of 15 directors (13 male and 2 female), including 5 independent directors. ASUS aims to leverage the professional expertise of industry leaders to integrate external stakeholder perspectives and enhance the quality of business operations. The Chairman, Jonney Shih, does not concurrently serve as President, ensuring a separation of leadership roles.

The name and education of each Board member as well as the holding positions of other companies are shown in the Annual Report.

ASUS requires an average board attendance rate of at least 85%, as stipulated by the Corporate Governance Evaluation Indicators. On May 28, 2025, the ASUS Shareholders' Meeting elected two female directors (one seat each for a director and an independent director.).

All members of the Board of ASUS are highly disciplined to avoid any conflicts of interest, and the relevant statement is clearly provided in “Rules and Procedures of Board of Directors Meetings”. In case the Directors or Managers of ASUS undertake the business operation within the scope of business run by ASUS for themselves or in favor of a third party, they are required by law to obtain the approval of the General Meeting of shareholders in advance.

Number of Directors

15

Number of Female Directors

2

Number of Independent Directors

5

Percentage of Independent Directors

33%

Remuneration Policy for Directors and Managers

Director Remuneration Policy

Compensation for Managers

Linkage between the compensation and business performance and future risk exposure

Director Remuneration Policy

The Company's Remuneration Policy for Directors includes compensation and remuneration.

  • Directors' compensation: Article 17 ASUS’ “Articles of Incorporation” states that "The Company shall pay remuneration to the directors of the Company for the performance of the duties of the Company regardless of profit or loss of the Company. The Board of Directors is authorized to determine the amount of such remuneration based upon the extent of his/her participation and contribution to the Company."
  • Director's remuneration: Article 20 of the ASUS’ “Articles of Incorporation” states that "The current year’s profit, if any, should be used first to cover accumulated deficit, and then the remaining balance shall be distributed: no more than 1% as directors’ remuneration.” In 2025, the actual allocation ratio was 0.3%.

Compensation for Managers

  • The Company references the prevailing salary and benefits in the industry to determine the amount of compensation allocated to each manager. It would also consider its business performance, as well as personal duties and contributions of each manager to provide reasonable compensation. The Human Resources Department shall propose the compensation, and then reviewed by the Remuneration Committee and submitted to the Board of Directors for approval.

Linkage between the compensation and business performance and future risk exposure

  • The Company's remuneration policy and related payment standards and system are reviewed based on the Company's overall operating conditions, future risks and development trends of the industry, and sustainable operation of the enterprise, and the payment standards are approved based on the performance achievement rate and contribution, in order to enhance the effectiveness of the Board of Directors and the Company's overall organizational team.
  • The Company's managers' performance objectives are integrated with risk management to ensure that possible risks within their responsibilities are managed and prevented. Important decisions at the management level are made after weighing various risk factors, and the performance of the related risk management is reflected in the company's profitability, which leads to correlation. The Company’s Remuneration Committee also regularly reviews and evaluates the remuneration system of directors and managers and submits relevant proposals to the Board of Directors for deliberation in order to maintain a balance between operational performance and risk management of the Company.

Board Performance Evaluation

To implement sound corporate governance and enhance both the functionality and operational efficiency of the Board of Directors, ASUS has established the “Self-Evaluation of the Board of Directors.” These measures stipulate that at least one performance evaluation must be conducted annually for the Board of Directors, individual board members, and all functional committees. The evaluation covers areas such as participation in company operations, understanding of corporate goals and missions, director selection and ongoing education, and internal controls. Furthermore, a performance evaluation of the Board of Directors shall be conducted by an external professional independent institution or a team of external experts and scholars at least once every three years; an external performance evaluation was conducted in October 2025.

The internal evaluation of the 2025 Board of Directors performance was completed by board members through self-assessment questionnaires, and the evaluation results were reported to the Board of Directors in January 2026:

  1. Overall Board of Directors and Individual Board Members: The overall operation of the Board of Directors is excellent, complying with corporate governance standards and effectively fulfilling the functions of the Board of Directors.
  2. Functional Committees: The overall operation of each committee is sound and complies with corporate governance. The members of each committee have fulfilled their duties diligently, effectively enhancing the functions of the Board of Directors.

Linking ESG Performance with Executive Compensation

To reinforce sustainability governance, in 2023 the variable compensation of the Co-Chief Executive Officers was tied to sustainability performance, using the achievement rates of ASUS’s global RE100 commitment and the Group’s Science-Based Targets (SBT) decarbonization goals as evaluation metrics. In 2025, variable compensation for the Co-Chief Executive Officers, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Sustainability Officer, and other senior executives was linked to sustainability performance across ASUS’s four strategic sustainability pillars, allowing up to a 10% adjustment in variable pay weight.

Climate Action

  • Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets
  • Renewable Energy Usage Achievement Rate

Circular Economy

  • Use of Environmentally Friendly Materials
  • Revenue Share from Eco-Labelled Products

Responsible Manufacturing

  • Supplier RBA Non-Conformance Improvement Rate
  • Percentage of Responsible Minerals from Certified Smelters

Value Creation

  • Number of Industry Talent Trained

Business unit leaders promoting eco-friendly products and low-carbon supply chain management follow ASUS’s SBT decarbonization roadmap. The 2030 target of reducing Scope 3 emissions from “Purchased Goods and Services” and “Use of Sold Products” by 30% serves as the evaluation metric, with variable compensation weights adjustable by up to 10%.

Functional Committee

  • Details of Audit Committee and Remuneration Committee, please visit Corporate Governance/Board Committees of Investor Relations website for further information.
  • Details of Information Security Committee, please refer to Information Security Management website for further information.

Audit Committee

To enhance the Board of Directors’ oversight of the quality and integrity of the company’s accounting, auditing, financial and non-financial reporting processes, as well as financial and operational controls, ASUS has established an Audit Committee. The committee is composed of five independent directors.

Remuneration Committee

The Remuneration Committee is composed of three independent directors and is tasked with assisting the Board of Directors in formulating and evaluating the company’s overall compensation and benefits policies, as well as the remuneration of directors and managers. The committee ensures that the company’s compensation arrangements comply with relevant regulations and are sufficient to attract top talent.

Business Continuity Management Committee

The Business Continuity Management Committee (BCM Committee) is composed of five independent directors, with all independent directors bringing external stakeholder concerns into the risk assessment process. The Co-CEOs and COO regularly convene cross-departmental risk management meetings to develop strategies for addressing major interdepartmental risk-related issues, and report regularly to the Board of Directors.

Corporate Sustainability Committee

The Corporate Sustainability Committee was established in 2025 and is composed of five independent directors and two Co-CEOs. As the highest-level sustainability management body at ASUS, the committee is responsible for reviewing the Group’s sustainability operations and implementation progress, reporting annually to the Board of Directors. Under the committee, the Sustainability Center coordinates quarterly meetings with sustainability representatives from each subsidiary to collaboratively develop and implement action plans addressing group-wide sustainability issues.

Sustainability Governance

Sustainability and Green Quality Management Center

ASUS established a unit dedicated to sustainable development in 2009 to monitor global sustainable development trends, analyze sustainability issues in governance, environment, and society. It integrated the core of operation with our innovation in product and service to form strategic sustainable direction to execute relevant programs. The Sustainability and Green Quality Management Center is established with the CEO serving as the highest-level manager, as mandated by the Chairman. The CEO is responsible for overseeing the sustainability projects and ensuring the achievement of goals related to material issues. The unit is led by the Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO) who is responsible for analyzing the trend of global sustainability, managing sustainability policy, objectives, and actions. The CSO regularly reports to the Board of Directors each year and submits the policies and targets, key sustainability projects and the performances for review.

This is the picture of ASUS' Sustainability Governance Structure.

Corporate Sustainability Committee

To address evolving sustainability trends and seize accompanying opportunities and challenges, the ASUS Corporate Sustainability Committee was established in 2025. Comprised of five independent directors and the two Co-Chief Executive Officers, it serves as ASUS’s highest-level sustainability governance body. The Committee reviews the Group’s sustainability management operations and execution progress and reports annually to the Board of Directors. Under its oversight, the Sustainability Center convenes quarterly meetings with Sustainability Management Representatives from each subsidiary to jointly formulate and implement action plans addressing Group-wide sustainability issues.

This is the picture of ASUS' Corporate Sustainability Committee

GreenASUS Steering Committee & SERASUS Steering Committee

To horizontally implement the ESG-related ISO management system standards across various departments within the Company, we have established the "GreenASUS and SERASUS Management Committee." Senior management has appointed a management representative responsible for the Company's ISO 9000 Quality Management System, ISO 14001 Environmental Management System, ISO 45001 Occupational Health and Safety Management System, and QC 080000 Hazardous Substance Process Management System.

It holds periodic meetings and sends e-newsletters with contents including but not limited to companywide sustainable development information, the recent activities of managementsystem, and the latest legal announcements. The members of the Committee come from the business units, procurement department, customer service, administration, legal and other departments. The communication and coordination are carried out across the units, and the resources can be effectively allocated throughout the company. All ASUS people can work together in a consistent direction to combine the sustainability and core of operation to become one of the competitiveness advantages.

Management System ISO 9001 ISO 14001 ISO 45001
Coverage Rate* 100% 100% 87.5%


*Certification coverage rate is calculated for companies within a group whose operations encompass manufacturing and have an employee count exceeding 100.